ADHD and Impulsive Response Anticipation: Why Intelligence Doesn’t Reveal Itself Clearly

By: Dr. Fabiano de Abreu Agrela Rodrigues – post-PhD in Neuroscience and specialist in behavioral genomics

Initial Neuroscientific Premise

The misinterpretation of intelligence in individuals with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), especially in cases of double exceptionality, results from a methodological and functional flaw in the analysis of cognitive performance: the reading of expressive behavior is taken as a direct reflection of intellectual capacity, without considering the specific failure of working memory and its implications in the neural circuits of logical integration.

Neurobiological and Genomic Argument

Working memory, mediated primarily by connections between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (BA 9/46), the posterior parietal cortex and structures such as the thalamus and the caudate nucleus, performs the executive function of maintaining, updating and manipulating information in real time. In individuals with ADHD, there is clear evidence of dysfunction in this circuitry, mainly through compromised dopaminergic modulation (Volkow et al., 2009, DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09040472), which directly impacts the ability to hold and process data prior to a response.

Not only that, recent genomic studies, including those described in the Genetic Intelligence Project (GIP), show that polymorphic variants in genes such as SNAP25, DRD4, DAT1 and COMT impact both synaptic efficiency and dopaminergic modulation in the prefrontal cortex (GIP, 2025; see also Davis et al., 2010, DOI: 10.1007/s10519-010-9350-4). This genetic predisposition contributes to impulsive hyperreactivity and an anticipatory cognitive style, impairing the deep and logical processing that characterizes the response considered “intelligent” according to normative standards.

Cognitive and Interpretative Consequence

The anticipation of the response, marked by spontaneous impulsivity, interrupts the flow of information through working memory, which should function as an integration interface between short- and long-term memory. This generates rapid but superficial responses, without passing through the frontoparietal network of logical reasoning. The result is a verbal or behavioral emission that appears disorganized or low in intelligence, when in fact it is an “operational deviation” in the synaptic hierarchy, not in the basal intellectual capacity.

As demonstrated in the DWRI (Developmental Wide Regions of Intellectual Interference) model, intelligence should be understood as a dynamic interaction between multiple neural systems – including default-mode networks, limbic circuitry, and associative cortex – and not as a linear construct based on immediate performance (RODRIGUES, 2023).

Conclusion: Fallacy of Superficial Interpretation

Therefore, what is perceived as “less intelligent responses” in ADHD subjects with high intellectual capacity does not reflect an intelligence deficit, but rather a failure in the mediation of the response by working memory, especially when there is impulsivity not inhibited by the anterior cingulate or orbitofrontal cortex. This anticipation compromises logic, not basal cognition. Understanding this architecture allows us to reclassify these individuals not as limited, but as subjects with difficult-to-read intelligence.

Scientific References

RODRIGUES, Fabiano de Abreu Agrela. Neurobiology and Foundations of Intelligence DWRI. 2023.

DAVIS, OSP et al. A Three-Stage Genome-Wide Association Study of General Cognitive Ability. Behavior Genetics, 40, 759–767, 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s10519-010-9350-4.

VOLKOW, ND et al. Evaluating Dopamine Reward Pathway in ADHD. American Journal of Psychiatry, 166(8), 2009. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09040472.

WhatsApp
Telegram
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *