Difference Between Giftedness (2SD) and Profound Giftedness (3SD)

The scientific literature on giftedness is extensive, yet there remains a lack of deep studies on individuals with exceptionally high IQs, classified as 3 standard deviations above the mean (3SD), also known as profound giftedness. This paucity of data stems both from the rarity of this population and the methodological challenges of studying such a unique group. However, existing studies unveil a notably complex and heterogeneous experience of gifted individuals.

Behavioral and Educational Aspects:

Studies suggest that, contrary to expectations, an extremely high IQ (3SD) does not necessarily equate to greater academic success. Individuals with 3SD face more pronounced educational challenges than their peers with IQs classified as 2 standard deviations above the mean (2SD). This difference is attributed to the intense behavioral and emotional traits of profoundly gifted individuals, such as mood swings and difficulties adapting to conventional school environments. Interestingly, research shows that mothers of 3SD children tend to promote more autonomy and exert less pressure for academic performance, potentially leading to lower school engagement, while 2SD children often experience greater parental pressure for academic achievements, which can boost their performance but also cause anxiety and stress.

Creativity and Expression:

The expression of creativity significantly varies between these two groups. Individuals with 2SD typically exhibit applied creativity, utilizing acquired knowledge to develop innovative solutions in specific areas. In contrast, 3SD individuals have a more divergent approach, exploring original and unconventional ideas often in fields they have not formally learned.

Emotional and Social Intelligence:

Emotional and social intelligence, not assessed by conventional IQ tests, is notably more refined in 3SD individuals. They possess an enhanced ability to understand and manage emotions and a deeper perception of social nuances, which can significantly improve their social interactions and adaptation to various contexts.

Clinical Aspects:

Although giftedness is not classified as a pathology, the emotional intensity and hypersensitivity common among gifted individuals can increase susceptibility to mental disorders such as depression and anxiety. However, the elevated emotional intelligence observed in 3SD individuals may serve as a protective factor, aiding in emotional regulation and the development of adaptive coping strategies.

Conclusion:

Understanding the nuances and heterogeneity of the gifted experience is essential for developing effective educational and clinical interventions that promote the development and well-being of these individuals. Future research should delve deeper into the neurobiological foundations of giftedness, examine the interaction between genetic and environmental factors in the development of intelligence and creativity, and assess the impact of different educational and therapeutic approaches on the well-being and success of these exceptional talents.

References

BRODY, Linda E. The study of exceptional talent. High Ability Studies, v. 16, n. 1, p. 87-96, 2005.

CHIANG, H.-M.; TSAI, L.; CHEUNG, Y.; BROWN, A.; LI, H. A meta-analysis of differences in IQ profiles between individuals with Asperger’s disorder and high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, p. 1577-1596, 2014.

DEARY, I. J.; CARYL, P. G. Neuroscience and human intelligence differences. Trends in Neurosciences, 1997.

DIAZ-ASPER, C.; SCHRETLEN, D.; PEARLSON, G. How well does IQ predict neuropsychological test performance in normal adults? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, p. 82-90, 2004.

GUÉNOLÉ, Fabian et al. Behavioral profiles of clinically referred children with intellectual giftedness. BioMed Research International, v. 2013, 2013.

JAUŠOVEC, Norbert. Are gifted individuals less chaotic thinkers?. Personality and Individual Differences, v. 25, n. 2, p. 253-267, 1998.

LACOUR, A.-G.; ZDANOWICZ, N. IQ over 130 and phobia: correlation, consequences and other psychopathologies. Psychiatria Danubina, 31 Suppl 3, p. 386-389, 2019.

MACDONALD, Hope et al. Recognition and expression of emotional cues by autistic and normal adults. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, v. 30, n. 6, p. 865-877, 1989.

PERSSON, Roland S. Experiences of Intellectually Gifted Students in an Egalitarian and Inclusive Educational System: A Survey Study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, v. 33, n. 4, p. 536–569, 2010.

RABIEE, A.; SAMADI, S. A.; VASAGHI-GHARAMALEKI, B.; HOSSEINI, S.; SEYEDIN, S.; KEYHANI, M.; MAHMOODIZADEH, A. The cognitive profile of people with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Behavioral Sciences, 9, 2019.

RUNCO, Mark A. A longitudinal study of exceptional giftedness and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, v. 12, n. 2, p. 161-164, 1999.

SCHULTZ, R. A. Recognizing the Outliers: Behaviors and Tendencies of the Profoundly Gifted Learner in Mixed-Ability Classrooms. Roeper Review, v. 40, n. 3, p. 191–196, 2018.

SHAYWITZ, Sally E. et al. Heterogeneity within the gifted: Higher IQ boys exhibit behaviors resembling boys with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, v. 34, n. 1, p. 26-39, 2001.

SHIH, S.-S. Perfectionism, Implicit Theories of Intelligence, and Taiwanese Eighth-Grade Students’ Academic Engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, v. 104, n. 2, p. 131–142, 2011.

THALER, N. S.; BELLO, D. T.; RANDALL, C.; GOLDSTEIN, G.; MAYFIELD, J.; ALLEN, D. IQ profiles are associated with differences in behavioral functioning following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(8), p. 781-790, 2010.

TUCKER, Brooke; HAFERSTEIN, Norma Lu. Psychological intensities in young gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, v. 41, n. 1, p. 66-75, 1997.

© Photo by ThisisEngineering  on  Unsplash

WhatsApp
Telegram
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email