Summary:
The fragmentation of contemporary medical care, marked by the compartmentalization of the body and mind into isolated specialties, promotes a distancing from the comprehensive understanding of the subject. The Heráclito Research and Analysis Center (CPAH), under the direction of Dr. Fabiano de Abreu Agrela Rodrigues, proposes an integrative model that combines neuroscience, genomics, systemic psychology, and behavioral analysis. This article presents the difference between this proposal and the limitations of medicalization and the excessive simplification of functional medicine, discussing how multifactorial disorders such as histamine intolerance, ADHD, and neuropsychiatric syndromes can be addressed by a truly systemic architecture of understanding and intervention.
1. The fragmentation of care and the collapse of biomedical logic
The current biomedical model operates under a compartmentalized paradigm, where the patient is referred to a series of specialists who, in turn, consider only specific aspects of their symptoms. The consequence is the multiplication of diagnoses and prescriptions that do not communicate with each other, configuring an approach that disregards the interaction between biological, emotional and symbolic systems. Functional medicine, although it emerged as a counterpoint, often makes the same mistake by applying generic protocols based on diets, detoxifications or supplements without investigating the relational and identity context of the subject.
2. CPAH as a neuroscientific proposal for clinical reintegration
CPAH is different because it operates based on three complementary axes: genetic and neurobiological analysis, cognitive and emotional architecture based on the DWRI model, and systemic reading of family and social interactions. The proposal is not limited to modulating neurotransmitters or correcting intestinal microbiota, but seeks to understand how circuits such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, the limbic system, and the temporoparietal junction interact with personality traits, genetic predispositions, and family discourse. This approach enables not only a more accurate diagnosis, but also an intervention that considers the coherence of the individual’s internal and external systems.
3. Histamine as a multidimensional vector of dysfunction
Histamine intolerance, often attributed to diamine oxidase (DAO) deficiency, is understood in CPAH as a multifactorial phenomenon that articulates genetics, environment and neurobiology. Histamine acts as a central neuromodulator, participating in the regulation of sleep, attention, mood and inflammatory response. Changes in this axis can directly impact behavioral expression in conditions such as fibromyalgia, migraine, ADHD, asthma, anxiety and digestive disorders. However, treatment is not based exclusively on diets or supplementation. By integrating the analysis of SNPs such as AOC1 and HNMT with the symbolic mapping of the subject, it is possible to develop a therapeutic plan that also considers patterns of family loyalty, emotional avoidance traits and unconscious symbolic overload.
4. The systemic model as a response to therapeutic pseudointegration
Unlike the simplified solutions offered by some alternative or functional medicine models, CPAH proposes a real integration between science and subjectivity. The clinical architecture involves genetic mapping, analysis of the neuropsychological-cognitive axis according to the DWRI logic and structured family interventions. Reading the patient’s symbolic structure, including their linguistic repertoire, history of relationships and thought patterns, allows us to understand symptoms as expressions of systemic inconsistencies, and not as isolated biochemical failures.
5. Conclusion: health as a result of coherence between subsystems
Health, from the CPAH perspective, is not the absence of symptoms, but the expression of coherence between the individual’s internal and external flows. The body, behavior, emotions and narratives must be aligned. The patient is not treated as a defective organism that needs to be corrected, but as a system in functional disorganization that can be reintegrated based on the understanding of its multiple layers. The CPAH proposal therefore points to a clinic of the future, based not on mass protocols, but on the biographical, genetic and symbolic singularity of each individual.
References:
PINTO, James Yhon Robles; RODRIGUES, Fabiano de Abreu Agrela. Perspectives of the family system health clinic. Cognitiones, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 130–144, 2023. DOI: 10.38087/2595.8801.182
RODRIGUES, Fabiano de Abreu Agrela. Neurobiology and Fundamentals of Intelligence DWRI. 2023
GORIOUNOVA, Natalia A.; MANSVELDER, Huibert D. Genes, Cells and Brain Areas of Intelligence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 13, 2019. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00044
DAVIS, Oliver et al. A Three-Stage Genome-Wide Association Study of General Cognitive Ability. Behavior Genetics, vol. 40, p. 759–767, 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s10519-010-9350-4
ABREU, Fabiano de. The Relationship between Constant Thoughts about Death, Altruistic Behavior and Intelligence. 2023
