We determine diagnoses with or without levels, when, in reality, what we have is a variable. Therefore, I advocate the use of mathematical equations to determine the condition, as I have already written and have the outline of the equations to be used. The problem is being accepted in a narcissistic, factionalist, xenophobic scientific milieu.
We live in a culture where true geniuses are independent and hidden in their maladaptive perfectionism, and where rare geniuses with adaptive perfectionism get tired and become intolerant of their emotional variables. In a scenario where a scientific publication is a fortune, funded only by a few governments and universities for financial, not scientific, purposes.
How many gifted people are diagnosed with autism when they are actually gifted?
How many people with ADHD think they are gifted, when in reality they have only ADHD?
How many gifted people believe they have ADHD when in reality they are gifted?
What about autistic people with support levels 1, 2 and 3? What are the variables, the periodic tithe between the levels? And who came close to level 1 and was diagnosed with avoidant personality disorder, for example? What would it be like to be close to level 1? An AH/SD?
How many Aspergers from the past who do not understand why they are level 1 support feel different?
What about the person with TEL – Specific Language Disorder diagnosed with ASD when it is actually gifted?
How many introverts think they have ASD?
How many professionals apply IQ tests without performing other tests necessary for correct screening?
How many gifted people have high skills and trained for IQ tests? And how many gifted people do not see themselves in gifted groups because they have deep giftedness?
Do nuances make a difference? Yes.
